Talk:obsolescent

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Spinningspark in topic First attested

Usage note edit

Isn't it incorrect to say "soon-to-be obsolescent" as it is used on electronics? — This comment was unsigned.

Yes. Sofixit?  :-)   --Connel MacKenzie 16:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

First attested edit

I have removed the claim that the word was first attested around 1780. This seems to be a few decades too late. Samuel Johnson uses the word in his dictionary in 1755 in a non-mentiony way. I also found this 1761 usage, albeit in italics. SpinningSpark 16:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Return to "obsolescent" page.