Talk:one hundred and two

Deletion discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

one hundred and two

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I did not nominate one hundred and one and one hundred one; let us keep these to show the grammar; also, the entry has "A great many; numerous" as a sense.

This is a follow-up on Talk:one hundred and twelve, #two hundred and twenty-five (later at Talk:two hundred and twenty-five), and on #two hundred and one (later at Talk:two hundred and one).

A somewhat related discussion is at Talk:105.

Sum of parts number words (WT:CFI#General rule, WT:SOP). We may keep smaller sum of parts number words and round ones, but the above should not be kept.

Note: I did not tag them all with RFD tag. It seems their being listed here in RFD should suffice.

--Dan Polansky (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Delete all. We should not need multiple discussions to have these; basically, pursuant to the previous discussions yielding this result, we should have a speedy delete rule for numbers over 101 without idiomatic senses. bd2412 T 00:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Delete all those nominated. I agree that one hundred and one should be kept. DonnanZ (talk) 19:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Delete: I concur with DonnanZ. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deleted. bd2412 T 17:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic