Talk:pur sang

Latest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic RFV

Wordsmiths

edit

http://wordsmith.org/words/pur_sang.html claims this is also a noun and adverb. Rich Farmbrough, 18:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC).Reply

RFV

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


As pointed out on the talk page (of this page), this is tagged but not listed. It already has a few citations at this point, but they italicise the term as a borrowing... - -sche (discuss) 23:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

On the other hand, if fr.wikt is to be believed, the French term doesn't have the meaning the English term is claimed to have, so italics don't matter (English can't be borrowing a sense French doesn't have). - -sche (discuss) 18:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Kept by that logic; retag the entry if you disagree with that logic. - -sche (discuss) 11:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


Return to "pur sang" page.