Talk:three-parent baby
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic Request for verification
Request for verification
edit
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Is this actually in use? Mglovesfun (talk) 21:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Increasingly common in reproductive genetics circles, starting to get media coverage. See, for example, [1], [2], [3] TRATTOOO 22:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Request withdrawl, seems common enough to me. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Here's a Nature article on the subject: [4] TRATTOOO 22:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- We still should get cites in while there is no OneLook dictionary that has the term. DCDuring TALK 22:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps the entry should be at three-parent with redirects from three-parent baby and three-parent child. "Three-parent" seems, for now, to have a fairly specific, non-obvious sense. Probably also a neologism tag. DCDuring TALK 23:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds about right. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps the entry should be at three-parent with redirects from three-parent baby and three-parent child. "Three-parent" seems, for now, to have a fairly specific, non-obvious sense. Probably also a neologism tag. DCDuring TALK 23:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- We still should get cites in while there is no OneLook dictionary that has the term. DCDuring TALK 22:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Striking per discussion. (I actually did the redirect quite a while ago; sorry for not commenting at the time.) —RuakhTALK 14:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)