Talk:vpon

Latest comment: 7 years ago by -sche in topic Related discussions

RFV edit

 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Defined as an obsolete spelling of upon; this is attested in Middle English, but what about Modern English? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tangentially: see also Talk:vp. - -sche (discuss) 20:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
w:U gives the switch over to the modern u/v separation as mid-16th century, and I'm sure that there are plenty of cites between 1500 and 1550 of this word.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've added one citation from 1602 and one from 1620. - -sche (discuss) 22:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'd argue, like Prosfilaes, that this was clearly in widespread use. Any objection to closing the discussion? - -sche (discuss) 21:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Passed. - -sche (discuss) 06:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Related discussions edit

See list on Talk:vp. - -sche (discuss) 04:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Return to "vpon" page.