Template talk:es-adj form of

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Roger the Rodger in topic RFD discussion: September 2016–October 2021

RFD discussion: September 2016–October 2021 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


As above. No point in it. —CodeCat 19:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deprecate and keep, preventing further use through abuse filters. - [The]DaveRoss 12:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Categorisation of non-lemma forms is not without use. embryomystic (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Embryomystic always seems to break this template. Just so you know. --Gibraltar Rocks (talk) 17:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


Return to "es-adj form of" page.