Wiktionary

Thanks and persistent LQT replies problem

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Bequw

Apparently, when the LQT reply depths are set for 0, the replies bottom behaves as I mentioned. Setting it at zero gives the maximum number of visible threads, though not the most possible, which would have just the subject line showing.

About symbols and characters: don't they also have something like etymologies? I liked what is displayed at &, for example. I was wondering about quotation and ditto marks, but all punctuation and other symbols would merit such attention. Do you know of any good references that cover any subset of symbols and characters thoroughly ? DCDuring TALK 15:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

DCDuring TALK‎15:24, 4 September 2010

I'm assuming then that the preference change allows you to use LQTs better. Great. I've registered this bug.

The symbols should have etymologies, though they may not be that informative for dingbats. For sources, I've seen this site (and its sources) used several times, but it's limited to math.

Bequw → τ‎19:38, 4 September 2010
 
Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Bequw/Thanks_and_persistent_LQT_replies_problem/reply_(3)#Thanks_and_persistent_LQT_replies_problem_331"