User talk:Conrad.Irwin/pos errors

Circumfixes

Well, these are circumfixes, we just don't allow that header yet. We either need to add that header, or delete the entries concerned, as AFAICT neither circumfix nor confix are valid headers. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

They aren't mentioned at WT:POS either, I seem to remember there being a stupid amount of contention about *fix headings. (This page really just lists headings there are fewer than ten entries for, the remaining headings are at User:Conrad.Irwin/poses) Conrad.Irwin 10:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

English

Struck all English cases, resolved or in RfD. DCDuring TALK 17:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I prefer them removed rather than struck, it makes it easier to find which cases haven't been resolved. Cheers. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Seemingly valid headers

If you're wondering why Derived terms, See also (etc.) are on this list, it's mostly because they contain lines starting with #. Other than that, move them to L4 (level 4, ====) and that should fix it. Clearly, no inflection templates under 'See also' either. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The correct fix is to replace the # by a * (and remove the inflection templates and whatever else mess is there). The level of the heading makes no difference, some words have level 5 part-of-speech headers (nested under ==English, ===Etymology 1, ====Pronunciation 1, =====Noun 1) Thanks for everything you've done so far. Conrad.Irwin 10:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)