User talk:mxn/2007
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/en/timeline/4yeewfibvh6lz82804jcqw1jb7kpwgp.png)
No one’s paying attention to the discussions on this archive page anymore. Please start a new discussion at my main talk page.
Meta admin?
Are you an admin over on meta? http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Information_desk#Volap.C3.BCk_in_Wiktionary_main_page.3F ? --Connel MacKenzie 02:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Magnificent! Thank you. (Now I know who to bug, for meta: issues! w00t!) --Connel MacKenzie 04:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Can you get the language list fixed for rw? It should be "Kinyarwanda" in English, and "Ikinyarwanda" in Kinyarwanda. Robert Ullmann 12:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC) (rw.wikt sysop)
iwiki links
You know, the bot (RobotGMwikt) will do those automatically within a few days ... Robert Ullmann 08:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Vietnamese translations for listen
Could you help by adding the Vietnamese translations for the various meanings of listen? This word is a pet project of mine, and I would appreciate the assistance. Thanks, --EncycloPetey 22:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! --EncycloPetey 23:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Could you please explain in the above section, precisely where such requests are supposed to go, and perhaps describe the mechanism for something making it onto http://www.wiktionary.org/? TIA! --Connel MacKenzie 16:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
iwiki links
DO NOT EVER ADD iwiki links to templates! Never, ever! They are used way too much in the en.wikt.
You can add them to the documentation/talk pages.
You just sent the job queue to TWENTY THOUSAND PLUS entries for the server to re-process, and it will do it again with the revert!
Robert Ullmann 17:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Now at 38,909 completely useless server updates. Please don't do this. Robert Ullmann 17:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry to scream. Probably out of order. Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I know you do a very great deal for wikts. Robert Ullmann 23:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
template:en-noun and regular possessive forms of modern English nouns
There is currently an active vote at [[1]] regarding whether regular possessive forms of modern English nouns should have their own entries or not. As part of this it has been suggested that the {{en-noun}}
template might be modified to show the possessive forms in the inflection line of modern English noun entries (irrespective of the outcome of the vote). Your comments and/or votes are welcome until the end of the vote on 5th August 2007. You are receiving this note as you have edited template:en-noun and/or template talk:en-noun Thryduulf 17:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Please attend? TIA. --Connel MacKenzie 03:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ahhh, I can also bug Dmcdevit for these. Thanks anyhow! --Connel MacKenzie 04:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)