Appendix:Very_large_numbers

edit

It is fine that you are adding more number names to the very large numbers appendix, but you have completely messed up the bottom part of the table. There are columns that organize the names, and you have ignored the last two columns and put the names you are adding into the wrong columns. Can you please fix up your edits? Kiwima (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was able to manage to fix a few. The problem with larger numbers is that it’s more difficult to figure out larger numbers in the long scale, the larger the numbers are in the short scale. I was able to fix 10300,003 , 103,000,003 , 1030,000,003 , 10300,000,003 , and 103,000,000,003 because they all have an easy pattern to follow (being quin-(term here)). Meanwhile, other numbers like for example, 1060,003 and 1021,003 are more difficult to pinpoint exactly. Either way, the row isn’t “broken”, you don’t exactly need to have something there to keep all the others in place. Googology Wiki might have something on these numbers in the long scale. StopLoggingMeOutOfMyAccount (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply