Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser

User:Versageek for checkuser edit

  • Vote ends: 19 September 2007 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 19 August 2007
  • Acceptance:
I accept this nomination, thanks. --Versageek 12:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, Should I be chosen as a local CheckUser, I agree to abide by the WMF CheckUser policy as recorded on Meta. --Versageek 13:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit

  1.   Support. Note that Versageek is a CheckUser on WikiHow, so is already familiar with these complex tools. DAVilla 12:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support —Stephen 13:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support Rod (A. Smith) 19:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support EncycloPetey 19:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support. bd2412 T 02:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   SupportSaltmarsh 06:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support Connel MacKenzie 06:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Jeffqyzt 13:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support We need more checkusers, from what I've seen, and I'm sure Versageek would be a good person to have and use the tools. Neskaya talk 21:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support SemperBlotto 21:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   'Support 'ArielGlenn 21:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support Tohru 12:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support I'm wary of creating any new CheckUsers at all, but I'll support one as I think that at least, might have utility. None of the other candidates are untrustworthy, but I think Versageek is ideal, and has experience to boot. Dmcdevit·t 07:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support H. (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Williamsayers79 10:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support --Cometstyles 21:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support Keene 11:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

  1.   Oppose Aphaia 04:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Not personal but reviewing the log, English Wiktionary doesn't seem to need another checkuser. At least now. 50 checks were performed since August 1, 2007. I think three users enough to deal with them. And generally I think the number of checkuser granted users should be kept only as many as necessary.[reply]

Abstain edit

Decision edit