Wiktionary talk:Dhivehi transliteration

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 43.231.28.163 in topic "SAMT"

"SAMT"

edit

There is no such thing as a SAMT transliteration. The page about it in Wikipedia (now deleted because uncited) simply had a chart of Dhivehi sounds romanized into ISO 15919. I have simply no idea what romanization scheme was used for the romanization of Arabic characters in SAMT. They seem to have been selected from the chart of Arabic Romanization in Wikipedia to the maker of the article's liking. If this statement by me is untrue, or if there are actual academic sources using this method, then anyone is invited to confirm this so as to remake the SAMT article. 43.231.28.163 11:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Return to the project page "Dhivehi transliteration".