English

edit
 
English Wikipedia has an article on:
Wikipedia

Etymology

edit

Lemma named after the Japanese mathematician Nobuo Yoneda (1930–1996).

Noun

edit

Yoneda lemma

  1. (category theory) Given a category   with an object A, let H be a hom functor represented by A, and let F be any functor (not necessarily representable) from   to Sets, then there is a natural isomorphism between Nat(H,F), the set of natural transformations from H to F, and the set F(A). (Any natural transformation   from H to F is determined by what   is.)
    As a corollary of the Yoneda lemma, given a pair of contravariant hom functors   and  , then any natural transformation   from   to   is determined by the choice of some function   to map the identity   to, by the component   of  . This implies that the Yoneda functor is fully faithful, which in turn implies that Yoneda embeddings are possible.
    • Yoneda Lemma: Nat(Hom(A,–), F) ≅ F(A)
    ∴ Nat(Hom(A,–), Hom(B,–)) ≅ Hom(B,A)
    ∴ A ≅ B iff Hom(A,–) ≅ Hom(B,–)
    i.e. A is isomorphic to B if and only if A's network of relations is isomorphic to B's network of relations.
    [1]
    • 2020, Emily Riehl, quoting Fred E. J. Linton, The Yoneda lemma in the category of Matrices[2]:
      And then there's the Yoneda Lemma embodied in the classical Gaussian row reduction operation, that a given row reduction operation (on matrices with say k rows) being a "natural" operation (in the sense of natural transformations) is just multiplication (on the appropriate side) by the effect of that operation on the k-by-k identity matrix.

      And dually for column-reduction operations :-)

Translations

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Alexander Maier, Ph.D. (actor) (2023 June 26), 21:23 from the start, in Category Theory for Neuroscience (pure math to combat scientific stagnation)[1], Astonishing Hypothesis, via YouTube:

    two objects, c and a are isomorphic (the same) if and only if
    their functors
    hom(-,c) and hom(-,a)
    are isomorphic (the same).