See also: diaeresis and diæresis

English edit

Noun edit

diaëresis (plural not attested)

  1. (nonstandard) Rare spelling of diaeresis.
    • 1838, William Lennie, The Principles of English Grammar, Comprising the Substance of All the Most Approved English Grammars Extant, Briefly Defined, and Neatly Arranged; With Copious Exercises in Parsing and Syntax, 19th edition, page 163:
      Diaëresis (¨) is used to divide a diphthong into two syllables; as, aërial.
    • 1848, John Forbes, The Principles of Gaelic Grammar; With the Definitions, Rules, and Examples, Clearly Expressed in English and Gaelic: Containing Copious Exercises for Reading the Language, and for Parsing and Correction, 2nd edition, page 251:
      7. Synaeresis, the opposite of Diaëresis, is the throwing of two syllables into one.
    • 1866, Matthias Green, An English Grammar, given in the Simplest and Most Attractive Method Ever Propounded; With Copious Examples and Exercises, page 164:
      The Diaëresis (¨) placed over the latter of two vowels denotes that the diphthong is to be sounded as two syllables; as Boötes.
    • 1870, James B. Lawrence, China and Japan, and a Voyage Thither: An Account of a Cruise in the Waters of the East Indies, China, and Japan, page 274:
      As the sound of each character is produced by a single emission of the voice, their spoken language is monosyllabic. Where two syllables appear to be, from the sound, it will be found upon examination that they are two characters joined, and where the pronunciation is written with a diaëresis, both vowels are, or should be sounded together.
    • 1879, George Bartle, A New Grammar of the English Language with the Principles of Analysis, page 183:
      Diaëresis (¨) placed over a diphthong shows that it must be pronounced in two syllables: as, Aërometer.
    • 1900, Guy Steeley, The Modern Elocutionist Or Popular Speaker: A Manual of Instruction on Cultivation of the Voice, Gesticulation, Expression, Posing, Etc., page 120:
      The sibyl apologizingly answered: “There is ratably an allegeable difference between a conferable ellipsis and trisyllabic diaëresis.”

Anagrams edit