Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin

User:CodeCat for admin edit

Support edit

  1.   Support Yair rand 00:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Equinox 21:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   SupportInternoob (DiscCont) 20:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support   AugPi 20:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support Conrad.Irwin 22:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support even though I may be somewhat biased. -- Prince Kassad 21:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support Mglovesfun (talk) 09:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support —Stephen 02:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Even if he doesn’t patrol, the tools will help him do good work. —Stephen 02:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

  1.   Abstain JamesjiaoTC 08:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC) I absolutely love the work CodeCat does around here and it's also nice to have another Dutch editor fighting alongside of me. He's fully capable of taking on the admin position, but I don't want to impose the additional workload on him. So I shall abstain from voting. JamesjiaoTC 08:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Abstain Razorflame 22:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC) I, too, will abstain from voting because I do not know the work done by the user or the user in question, so I cannot, without any sort of bias, vote support or oppose for this candidate.[reply]
  3.   Abstain - his acceptance was very lukewarm - I don't think he will ever actually patrol recent changes and/or fight vandalism. SemperBlotto 21:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact he's a bot editor, if his bot goes wrong he can fix it much quicker by reverting/deleting. That was my primary (but not only) reason for supporting. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decision edit