Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/běaxǫ

This Proto-Slavic entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Slavic edit

Etymology edit

(This etymology is missing or incomplete. Please add to it, or discuss it at the Etymology scriptorium.)

Verb edit

*běaxǫ

third-person plural imperfective imperfect of *byti
Synonym: *běšę

Descendants edit

South Slavic:
- Old Church Slavonic: бѣахѫ (běaxǫ),^[1] бѣхѫ (běxǫ)^[2]
- Bulgarian: бя́ха (bjáha)
- Macedonian: беа (bea)
- Serbo-Croatian:
  Unspecified script:^[3]
West Slavic:
- Old Czech: biechu^[4]
- Old Polish: biechą

References edit

^ Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “бѣахѫ”, in Codex Suprasliensis‎^[1] (in Old Church Slavonic), page (leaf) 1.5, line 28
^ Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “прикладаѥма бѣхѫ”, in Codex Suprasliensis‎^[2] (in Old Church Slavonic), page (leaf) 199, line 24
^ Đuro Daničić, editor (1880-1882), “a. bȉjȃh”, in Rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika‎^[3] (in Serbo-Croatian), volume 1, Zagreb: JAZU, page 360
^ Jan Gebauer (1886) “Tvaroslovné výklady a doklady ke slovesům třídy IV, VI a bezpříznakým. Kmeny praesentní bez příznaku.”, in Listy filologické a paedagogické, volume 13, Prague: Jednota českých filologů, Edvard Grégr, page 307

[1] Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “бѣахѫ”, in Codex Suprasliensis‎^[1] (in Old Church Slavonic), page (leaf) 1.5, line 28

[2] Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “прикладаѥма бѣхѫ”, in Codex Suprasliensis‎^[2] (in Old Church Slavonic), page (leaf) 199, line 24

[3] Đuro Daničić, editor (1880-1882), “a. bȉjȃh”, in Rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika‎^[3] (in Serbo-Croatian), volume 1, Zagreb: JAZU, page 360

[4] Jan Gebauer (1886) “Tvaroslovné výklady a doklady ke slovesům třídy IV, VI a bezpříznakým. Kmeny praesentní bez příznaku.”, in Listy filologické a paedagogické, volume 13, Prague: Jednota českých filologů, Edvard Grégr, page 307

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]