Talk:√
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 70.172.194.25 in topic Translingual status of linguistics meaing
Translingual status of linguistics meaing
editIn case the Translingual nature of the definition ever comes up for debate, I've only seen √ used this way in English text. As a side note, I've mostly seen it in on Wikipedia and Wiktionary, so it may be WMF jargon. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 06:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- @The Editor's Apprentice Do you mean the linguistics definition, or the mathematical?__Gamren (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Gamren In my previous comment I am referring to the linguistics definition. Separately, and for the record, I have since seen √ used in the linguistics sense described at the entry outside of Wikimedia Foundation websites like Wiktionary and Wikipedia suggesting it is not unique jargon. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, I only just noticed the header. D'oh.__Gamren (talk) 13:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Gamren In my previous comment I am referring to the linguistics definition. Separately, and for the record, I have since seen √ used in the linguistics sense described at the entry outside of Wikimedia Foundation websites like Wiktionary and Wikipedia suggesting it is not unique jargon. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
User:The Editor's Apprentice, User:Gamren, I added citations. There are a lot of 20th century ones but searching is difficult. Some OCR changes it to V, which is how I found some. 70.172.194.25 04:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)