Talk:方剂学

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Justinrleung in topic RFC discussion: June 2014–January 2017

RFC discussion: June 2014–January 2017

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


466 hyponyms, by my best count (in a collapsible box, true, but that's still a lot). Wouldn't this be better as a category? Chuck Entz (talk) 23:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not only that, but the terms in the list have encyclopedic information such as lists of ingredients with quantities in grams. No evidence that this has ever been looked at by anyone but the creator and some bots. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't seem to be a problem now. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 20:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "方剂学" page.