Talk:炮火的洗禮
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: June–August 2017
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
SOP. Handled by 洗禮.--2001:DA8:201:3512:E49E:3757:EDD0:9CB5 12:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- If it is used as English baptism by fire, it should be kept. I suggest sending this to RFV. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 16:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- The English term is idiomatic does not mean the Chinese one is. baptism does not mean ordeal in English.--2001:DA8:201:3512:98C7:6612:A4DC:CF14 18:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sure, but there doesn't need to be any actual 炮火 involved, right? How is it SoP then? — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 18:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- The English term is idiomatic does not mean the Chinese one is. baptism does not mean ordeal in English.--2001:DA8:201:3512:98C7:6612:A4DC:CF14 18:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- I think this is idiomatic enough to be keepable. Wyang (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep because it doesn't literally involve firing at Christians. —suzukaze (t・c) 14:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- RFD kept: no consensus for deletion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)