Talk:오적어
@Tibidibi, LoutK Is this term actually in use? Or should it be sent to RFV? —Suzukaze-c (talk) 13:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Suzukaze-c, I would RFV it. 오적어 is seen almost solely in the context of discussing historical sources (composed in Classical Chinese) which use the Chinese word 烏賊魚／乌贼鱼 (wūzéiyú), so I would consider this a sort of Sino-Korean transcription of the Chinese—if that makes sense—and not a real Korean word. stdict.korean.go.kr redirects it to 오징어 and has '오징어'를 한자를 빌려서 쓴 말이다.--Tibidibi (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- 烏賊魚 (in a list, which does not meet WT:ATTEST) —Fish bowl (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
It is the 'correct' hanja reading of the etymon (烏賊魚) of 오징어 (ojing'eo), and is not in actual use as a true Korean word (Talk:오적어). @Jusjih —Suzukaze-c (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- New Ace Korean Language Dictionary (Korean dictionary on MacOS) does have an entry for it. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 06:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- RFV failed. —Fish bowl (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)