Talk:πŒΌπ‰π„πŒ°π‚πŒ΄πŒΉπƒ

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFV discussion: November 2016

RFV discussion: November 2016 edit

 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Tagged but not listed. Attestation added. β€” Kleio (t Β· c) 16:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

@KIeio: Nobody's going to dispute a citation like that. You don't actually need to post these to RFV unless you are unsure about attestation, or are sure that there isn't any. β€”ΞœΞ΅Ο„Ξ¬knowledgediscuss/deeds 03:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I thought you were supposed to follow the whole procedure every time someone tagged something without a quote, per the rules at the top of this page (which is also why I posted the other Gothic entry right above this one here, which had been tagged by the same editor). β€” Kleio (t Β· c) 04:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Well, the tagger doesn't know what they're doing in this case and the entry is cited. No reason to make this page any longer than it has to be. β€”ΞœΞ΅Ο„Ξ¬knowledgediscuss/deeds 05:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
If it's just Rasptr tagging them out of spite, then I agree entirely with Metaknowledge. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Return to "πŒΌπ‰π„πŒ°π‚πŒ΄πŒΉπƒ" page.