Talk:-proof
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: February–September 2017
Deletion debate edit
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
As above. DCDuring TALK 23:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- I don't feel all that strongly, but I'd keep it. I don't see what definition we can add at proof that would cover it. Not an attestable definition anyway. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. It's covered by the Adjective, sense 2. These are compound words, not suffixed. Ƿidsiþ 14:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Kept for no consensus.--Jusjih 09:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's covered by the Adjective, sense 2. These are compound words, not suffixed. Ƿidsiþ 14:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This has been RFD before, but didn't attract much attention [1]. Not listed as a suffix in Oxford Online, but it is in Cambridge [2]. I think it should be discussed further. DonnanZ (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep using the lemming heuristic: “-proof”, in OneLook Dictionary Search. shows this is in Collins[3], Macmillan[4] and dictionary.com[5] (where it says "Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2017"). To me, it intuitively feels as a suffix or a combining form, yet the argument that this is in fact proof - adjective - "Firm or successful in resisting" as in "proof against harm", has some force. The intuition may stem from -proof being used in commonly used words like waterproof and bulletproof while the separate adjectival use of "proof" may be relatively rare. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- RFD kept: one pro-deletion vote does not consensus make. Please post your deletes before archiving to revert the result. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)