Talk:Dingsidang
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Nothing in Internet Archive, Goofle Books, or Goggle Scholar. In light of FaCIAbook and similar, I think that Dingsidang with its poor cites on Citations:Dingsidang may very well survive rfv or a vote. If anyone (including you wonderful IPs) can find another use or mention, please add it to the Citations:Dingsidang page. If it doesn't survive, that's fine with me- either result is okay. May be a good "test case" for the outermost limits of the new two week policy. I would say "keep" if Wiktionary is keeping FaCIAbook and similar. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- The "TEFL & TESOL" quotation is automatically generated from a template, and therefore shouldn't count as attestation. Go here, choose any prefecture, and then select any town, and you'll get the same boilerplate text with the location changed. All it proves is that the pinyin is in a database somewhere. Fortunately, there are still three citations without that one. I do think the discussion comes down to how much credence we lend to online sources. 70.172.194.25 04:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Looks to be 
cited. Ioaxxere (talk) 03:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)