Talk:Gezlik

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: February–May 2022

RFV discussion: February–May 2022

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Only one internet news article mentions this location- I added it to Citations:Gezlik. Does not yet have two more cites unless there are some maps or unsearchable sources. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Can we use the Arabic spelling? It should be easier to find. The Uyghur Wikipedia has it .... I searched for gezlik and got this .... [[1]] .... but its only using Gezlik as a transliteration. It might be better to just use the Arabic spelling and then respell it in the definition the way we do with some other languages using foreign alphabets like Russian.Soap 10:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply. Minor geography like this will always be hard to nail down with the three cites system. If you find examples of any of the other spellings, those would be helpful long term, even if the three cites for one of the spellings can't be found. At minimum, they could be saved on the Citations page in case this location got more attention in the future. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 01:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Gezlik" page.