Humorously? Really?

edit

Humorously? Really? --213.115.28.4 12:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion

edit
 

This entry has passed Wiktionary's verification process without prejudice.

This means that, while adequate citation may not have been recorded, discussion has concluded that usage is widespread and content is accurate
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so. See Wiktionary’s criteria for inclusion


Honest? --Connel MacKenzie 06:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Almost impossible to confirm or deny this kind of thing. It could just as easily be Husband's ;-) Depends on the person who writes it. But as far as I know, all my circle use it and, more importantly, understand it to mean Humble. Algrif 14:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
We could take all the fun out of the alternative definitions by putting the idea of such alternatives in "Usage notes" and mentioning the best examples. I wouldn't want to spend time verifying alternatives to the humble meaning. DCDuring 19:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, maybe it's an old timer thing. I've understood that to be a secondary meaning for 20 years now. So I googled to see if the understanding of my "circle" is way out there.
IMHO "In my honest opinion"
41,800 hits before expansion of similar. I think that's good enough for me?
If you're wondering, "in my Husband's opinion" also shows up. 10 hits. (All tongue in cheek of course. My favourite's the the one who claims she doesn't allow her husband to have one.) OK, I'm having fun, so let's see if I can stump the panel. Not easy! Other clowns: In my holy opinion, 75 hits, some on religious sites; hesitating-23, hellish-3 (darn, I thought I had it with that one) horrible-11, horrid-1, Ah! I did it! No hits for IMHO "in my harebrained opinion." That is, until google finds this page.  
Winter 06:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
rfv-prej, widespread usage - [The]DaveRoss 01:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Internet

edit

Since the OED now has this, should the "Internet" tag still apply? Please note that this was used before the internet's rise to high popularity, on USENET, and BBS/BBS-networks as well. 65.93.12.101 09:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

What does the OED's having it have to do with the "Internet" tag? Isn't this still primarily an Internetism? —RuakhTALK 02:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: November–December 2014

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-senses "in my (not-so-)honest opinion". An anon tried to delete it, and I have never heard of it. --WikiTiki89 01:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Failed Keφr 20:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply