Talk:Local Supercluster

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Local Supercluster

Doesn't meet WT:CFI#Place names.​—msh210℠ (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Or any other basis for inclusion AFAICT. Also probably wrong capitalization. Delete DCDuring TALK 14:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Why doesn't it? Local and supercluster are not "names of streets and other minor landmarks needed to create addresses". Keep. DAVilla 17:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Because it has only one of the five listed required items (and, when nominated, had none). It needs two.​—msh210℠ (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

In that case, I would tag it similar to entries with no language heading or not written in English, and give it a month before deleting if there's no progress. It doesn't make much sense to vote on it here. DAVilla 21:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Now it does meet the CFI. Keep but improve the definition: it's terribly POV.​​—msh210℠ (talk) 06:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

I assume that's humorous, as the "supercluster in which we live" is true for every living being (human or not) we know of. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Kept and cleaned up. DAVilla 08:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)