RFV discussion: December 2021–January 2022 edit

 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


OED says no Notusbutthem (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I find only two uses, one which is technically a use but might as well be a mention (it is in a passage discussing "ab-" words in the dictionary), and another in a passage that is consciously using difficult language and which doesn't strongly support the given definition.
tl;dr it's a classic dictionary-only term. This, that and the other (talk) 12:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Although it appears in a dictionary, this is a genuine use. Kiwima (talk) 05:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed (barely) Kiwima (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "abstringe" page.