Talk:algospeak

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Overlordnat1 in topic RFV discussion: May 2022–January 2023

RFV discussion: May 2022–January 2023 edit

 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Tagged by Jberkel, not listed. J3133 (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Washington Post article is the only citable source I've found. Perhaps it could be a hotword, but it still needs 3 cites, right? – Jberkel 21:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've added a durably archived cite, though it just paraphrases Lorenz' TWP article judging by the trailing citation. — Fytcha T | L | C 01:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
It seems to be catching on judging from more recent Google News hits. Given that there are already 3+ cites on the entry, going up to November, and the 2 further ones seem to be independent now, I've tagged it as a hot word as Jberkel suggested and will resolve this as provisionally keep—we can revisit it later in the year if it doesn't pass the one-year mark. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Surely the right course of action but Let's label this with the magic words RFD-kept and archive this thread a week from today if there aren't any objections raised in the meantime. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


Return to "algospeak" page.