Talk:cous
Deletion discussion
edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Tagged but not listed. See also WT:Requests for cleanup#cous. — Ungoliant (Falai) 15:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Cleaned up, not by me. DCDuring TALK 14:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Clocked out DCDuring TALK 01:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- RFV failed on the complete English entry: no quotations provided. An an auxi check, seems absent from most online dictionaries. Present in Urban Dictionary, but not in the senses of cousin and vagina. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
RFC
edit
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Two heteronyms in one entry; unattested material; informal pronunciation; plural(s) not indicated. — 146.179.8.134 14:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)