Talk:dead'n'buried

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

No hits on a cursory check.​—msh210℠ 16:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

70 hits on Google Books: http://books.google.fr/books?as_q=%22dead%27n%27buried%22&num=10&btnG=Recherche+Google&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_brr=0&as_pt=ALLTYPES&lr=lang_en&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_isbn=&as_issn= Lmaltier 21:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

All hits have spaces between words: dead 'n' buried instead of dead'n'buried. 'n' is simply an alternative form of and. Jamesjiao → ^{T ◊ C} 02:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Just rename it and delete the redirect IMO. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Fine by me, if this verification fails.​—msh210℠ 17:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Done and done. if anyone has any objections, raise you hand now or forever hold your peace :). Jamesjiao → ^{T ◊ C} 05:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)