Talk:for fake

RFV discussion

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Taking the quote as given, I get two b.g.c. hits. This is supposed to be a set phrase? Move to WT:BJAODN, if it were actually funny. --Connel MacKenzie 06:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Now cited. (This seems likely to be a series of independent nonces, but as it stands, it does seem to meet the CFI.) —Ruakh_TALK 13:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

RFV passed. —Ruakh_TALK 20:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)