Talk:population density
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: August–September 2015
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Non-idiomatic, means what it says, no need to have the separate article. Yurivict (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm leaning towards keep as a term of art, although I'm surprised to see that no lemmings have it. Defining density in terms of area instead of volume is unusual. Smurrayinchester (talk) 08:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- I would keep this one. It's a relatively important term, and there's quite a few translations. Donnanz (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Purplebackpack89 14:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- RFD kept per consensus 3:1:0 for keeping. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)