Open main menu

User talk:Purplebackpack89

Something disappeared.Edit

I offered to apologize to someone on Wikimedia for saying I could go troll-to-troll against Chuck Entz. But now, I can't find the offer. I'm ready to apologize, but I don't know where to apologize. I can't find it on your talk page, nor with the search function in Wiktionary nor Wikipedia. Can you please tell me where to go? 05:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey, leave me out of this! If you want to talk to User:Chuck Entz, talk to him at User talk:Chuck Entz. I'm not Chuck Entz. Yes, he is a frequent commentator on my talk page, but this is not the venue to talk to him. (Also, I archived your message). Purplebackpack89 14:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Why we don't need durable citationsEdit

  1. In today's world, a greater percentage of content is on not-necessarily-durable website rather than print media or durable websites.
  2. Compare to books. We don't link to every book we have, and we don't unfrequently cite rare books where Joe Avg is unlikely to ever obtain a compy.
  3. Some things don't stay up forever, but many things do. Instead of assuming that something will eventually disappear, we could assume that it won't (FWIW, Wikipedia makes the latter assumption; it doesn't require durable references
  4. If the quote that uses the word is already on Wiktionary, do we necessarily need a link to anything anyway?

Purplebackpack89 18:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Do you think you could please answer the question I asked to you at Equinox's talk page, about this subject? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
You mean the "other words" question? I can't think of one right this minute, but I would guess there are a number of words, particularly recent slang or words primarily used on the 'Net, that would benefit from a relaxation. Purplebackpack89 18:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
If you think of some words in the future, I'd be curious to know. As I said, I can't say I agree with your proposal at this exact moment, but knowing what words could be affected by it would make some practical difference and would be good way to start discussing. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
If you don't like our policies, start a vote to change them. Don't just whine about it all the time. You have to work with a system to change it. Equinox 15:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
There's a BP discussion going on this topic, @Equinox. Also, while you're hear, lemme ask you this: do you legitimately doubt that this word is used? Have you examined its internet usage? Purplebackpack89 18:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your signatureEdit

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

'''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="FFBB00">89</font>]]</font>''' : Purplebackpack89


<b style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<b style="color:#3A003A">Pur</b><b style="color:#800080">ple</b>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<b style="color:#991C99">back</b><b style="color:#C3C">pack</b><b style="color:#FB0">89</b>]]</b> : Purplebackpack89

Anomalocaris (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

K it should be fixed now Purplebackpack89 18:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Purplebackpack89".