Talk:prognostick
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: June–August 2017
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
bogus entry: its a misspelling and was never obsolete.68.151.25.115 01:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, no: it's well and truly attested, and it now well and truly obsolete. Although there is a case to be made that the adjectival use in period was actually as an attributive noun... especially given the capitalization in "Prognostick Signs" &c. --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 02:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Should be challenged at RFV if anywhere. Now has some cites. Keep. Equinox ◑ 21:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, of course. 2.30.99.169 08:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- RFD kept per consensus. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)