Talk:skiwampus
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Was marked for speedy deletion, but it seems to get enough hits to merit at least a month here. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- 4 Google Books hits, all dictionaries or thesauri; 1 Google Groups hit. Delete — lexicógrafo | háblame — 18:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Note that skewampus does meet the CFI; so if we delete this, the delete summary should point readers to [[skewampus]]. —RuakhTALK 19:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. —RuakhTALK 20:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)