Talk:uckfay
Aside from the fact that this page has been nominated for deletion, what cleanup does it require? bd2412 T 17:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
bowdlerized? edit
I disagree that this is a bowdlerization. It happens to be slightly less offensive, but not in the sense of "save the children" mentality? --Connel MacKenzie T C 17:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm... well, true it doesn't save the children... I'll return it to saying "slightly less offensive". bd2412 T 00:28, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
What usefulness does a redirect such as this one serve? TeleComNasSprVen 05:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- If it doesn’t redirect to uckfay, then it should be made into an normal entry that links to uckfay. Otherwise, looking up uckfay ouyay will be a dead end. —Stephen (Talk) 05:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
It stands a better chance as a redlink. Keeping it is a redirect does it more harm than good because there is less of a chance that it could be fleshed out as an entry proper since redirects are often overlooked. TeleComNasSprVen 05:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that you get more useful information searching for it and reading the search results than from the redirects. So, delete it. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted without prejudice. DAVilla 09:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)