Talk:yoten
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
- Discussion moved to WT:RFVE.
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
- Discussion moved from WT:RFDE.
(Deleted by @Robbie SWE.) It's a humorous past participle of yeet, and still linked to from that entry. It's in use ([1], [2], [3], [4]). See also yote#Etymology_3. grendel|khan 18:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Since the regular/expected past-tense form yeeted is attested, other past tense forms would require citations from CFI-compliant media (printed books, magazines, newspapers,... or decentrally archived Usenet, but I see nothing there...). In the absence of such citations — if the forms are rare and internet-only (and jocular) — yoten and yote should be removed from yeet (and yote should be deleted, although that is, strictly speaking, an RFV matter). - -sche (discuss) 18:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Moved from RFD. Yoten was requested to be undeleted, but as an unexpected form (when the expected form yeeted exists), would need citations. In turn, if it is not attested, it should be removed from yeet. And I request evidence of yote, on the same basis. - -sche (discuss) 19:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)