Template:R:kne:Vanoverbergh 1933

Morice Vanoverbergh (1933) “R:kne:Vanoverbergh 1933”, in A Dictionary of Lepanto Igorot or Kankanay. As it is spoken at Bauco (Linguistische Anthropos-Bibliothek; XII)‎[1] (in English and Kankanaey), Mödling bei Wien, St. Gabriel, Österreich: Verlag der Internationalen Zeitschrift „Anthropos“, →OCLC


Template data

edit

This template is for referencing the comprehensive Kankanaey dictionary authored by Maurice Vanoverbergh.

Template parameters[Edit template data]

This template prefers inline formatting of parameters.

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
Entry name1 entry

Defaults to the page name

Stringoptional
Page numberpage

The page number of the entry

Numberoptional
Quoted text, if applicabletext

no description

Stringoptional
Quoted text English translation, if applicablet

no description

Stringoptional

Considerations

edit

Southern or Northern?

edit

It is unclear whether this dictionary is focused on Southern terminologies or Northern. This dictionary is targeted at speech in Bauko, which is known to partly have both Southern and Northern Kankanaeys. The ultimate deciding factor is his entry for "yes", since it is known that "aw" is Southern while "owen" is Northern. This dictionary lists "aw" and not "owen", and so it is considered Southern Kankanaey.

Lack of part of speech

edit

This dictionary does not list by default each entry's part of speech; only certain entries have them. Extra care is needed to decide what the actual part of speech an entry is.

Verbs

edit

Vanoverbergh lists verbs as their roots. This is in contranst to Wiktionary.

Additionally, he lists verbs as having tenses. This is incorrect as Kankanaey verbs have aspect, not tense.

Affixes

edit

Affixes are not marked with a dash "-". This makes it hard to identify whether an entry is an affix or a regular word.

e versus a

edit

Vanoverbergh sometimes uses "e", wherein modern orthography uses "a". This is most evident in "man-", as he uses "men-".

Sort order of "ng"

edit

This dictionary's sorting of "ng" is inconsistent. Sometimes it is listed after "n" as if it was a separate letter, while sometimes it is listed as if "ng" are two separate "n" and "g" letters.