Unblock request edit

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

64.231.171.210 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

requesting that Robbie SWE take a closer look at my edits. I think this explored new territory and was not disruptive in any way. You can check the archive.is of efeminate for the page I created which he deleted: 3 sources were listed. "Efeminate" is not merely a mispelling of "Effeminate", but also a distinct word which is spelled that way (single F is intentional) and which as a verb, has a completely opposite meaning of depriving rather than endowing femininity. I was in the middle of explaining this when this block happened.

User:Robbie SWE I think your rollbacks were in error. 64.231.171.210 20:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Two of the quotes included the term "efemination", not the verb "efeminate". The third source is most likely a misspelling. If you contest the decision to delete this term, you are welcome to bring it up in the Tea Room. As a gesture of goodwill, I'll shorten your block. PS: please refrain from adding previously deleted contributions before you have consulted the community in the Tea Room. --Robbie SWE (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply



This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.

RIR WHOIS lookup: America Europe Africa Asia-Pacific Latin America/Caribbean