84.161.42.126

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

84.161.42.126 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

unjustified block.
Also:

1. It says "16:37, 20 December 2015 SemperBlotto [...] blocked [...] with an expiry time of 1 day", but it also says "This block has been set to expire: 23:37, 21 December 2015.". From 16:37 to 23:37 of the next day are 24+7=31 hours which is more than just 1 day = 24 hours.
2. SemperBlotto totally ignored what's written at WT:Vandalism (e.g. "users who are disrupting Wiktionary unintentionally should not be blocked" and "A reasonable effort should be made to communicate with such users").
3. SemperBlotto made a personal attack (see WT:NPA; calling someone a vandal when he isn't, obviously is a personal attack).
4. Please tell Chuck Entz that he's incorrect (cf. Wiktionary talk:Vandalism): The statement "no one associates the word vandalism with the Vandals- except, apparently, you" is incorrect. Not just the other user associates the two words, but anyone who knows both words and has some knowledge of the etymology can associate both words.
5. Change "Konzonanz" into "Konsonanz" at Konsonant.
6. Replace the etymology request at addieren with "From Latin addere" and add the alternative form "addiren".
7. Undo the latest edits at vale and valete. The part of speech of an English translation ("goodbye" being an interjection) does not determine the part of speech of a foreign word (vale and valete are just imperatives, that is they are verb forms).