I know you want messages on your 'pedia page, but they don't have this template :).

Hello, and welcome to Wiktionary!

If you have edited Wikipedia, you probably already know some basics, but Wiktionary does have a few conventions of its own. Please take a moment to learn our basics before jumping in.

First, all articles should be in our standard format, even if they are not yet complete. Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with it. You can use one of our pre-defined article templates by typing the name of a non-existent article into the search box and hitting 'Go'. You can link Wikipedia pages, including your user page, using [[w:pagename]], {{pedia}}, or {{wikipedia}}.

Notice that article titles are case-sensitive and are not capitalized unless, like proper nouns, they are ordinarily capitalized (Poland or January). Also, take a moment to familiarize yourself with our criteria for inclusion, since Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia. Don't go looking for a Village pump – we have a Beer parlour. Note that while Wikipedia likes redirects, Wiktionary deletes most redirects (especially spelling variations), in favor of short entries. Please do not copy entries here from Wikipedia if they are in wikipedia:Category:Copy to Wiktionary; they are moved by bot, and will appear presently in the Transwiki: namespace.

A further major caveat is that a "Citation" on Wiktionary is synonymous with a "Quotation", we use these primary sources to construct dictionary definitions from evidence of the word being used. "References" (aka "Citations" on Wikipedia) are used predominantly for verifying Etymologies and usage notes, not the definitions themselves. This is partly to avoid copyright violation, and partly to ensure that we don't fall into the trap of adding "list words", or words that while often defined are never used in practice.

Note for experienced Wikipedians:
Wiktionary is run in a very different manner from Wikipedia and you will have a better experience if you do not assume the two are similar in culture. Please remember that despite your experience on Wikipedia, that experience may not always be applicable here. While you do not need to be an expert, or anything close to one, to contribute, please be as respectful of local policies and community practices as you can. Be aware that well-meaning Wikipedians have unfortunately found themselves blocked in the past for perceived disruption due to misunderstandings. To prevent a similar outcome, remember the maxim: be bold, but don't be reckless!
Having said that, we welcome Wikipedians, who have useful skills and experience to offer. The following are a couple of the most jarring differences between our projects that Wikipedians may want to learn up front, so things go smoothly for everyone. Changing policy pages on Wiktionary is very strongly discouraged. If you think something needs changing, please discuss it at the beer parlour, after which we may formally vote on the issue. You should also note that Wiktionary has very different user-space policies, we are here to build a dictionary and your user-page exists only to facilitate that. In particular we have voted to explicitly ban all userboxes with the exception of {{Babel}}; please do not create or use them.

We hope you enjoy editing Wiktionary and being a Wiktionarian. Conrad.Irwin 13:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

basseyn edit

Information like synonyms should go under "See also" or "Synonyms", not on the inflection line. Thanks. Atelaes 08:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your advice. But how and where can I mention that given synonym is used wider than the word itself? Alessandro 14:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I suppose you could just make a parenthetical note next to the synonym. Atelaes 18:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

oşeklemeq edit

This is still listed in oşeklemek as an alternative spelling. Is that not correct? -- Visviva 17:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, it is not correct. It is definatley wrong spelling. I've removed its entry from oşeklemek. Alessandro 17:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. By the way, is this you editing your /Şive sözleri page? I just want to check, as we have had some problems with anons editing user subpages lately. Cheers, -- Visviva 09:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
It was a friend of mine, I've asked him to help me, so everything is OK. Alessandro 11:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, they are true spelling in Northern dialect. But it is ok for me, if they are defined Northern Dialect. Thanks your contributions.--Mzekiu 20:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Redirects edit

Hi Alessandro! I've noticed that you moved a lot of articles, leaving a lot of redirects in the background. Were all of those actually misspellings that can be safely deleted? Wiktionary does not like redirects - they're left only for extreme purposes. You can mark anything you'd like to have speedydeleted with template {{delete}}. Cheers --Ivan Štambuk 19:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Yes, all of those are actually misspellings. Unfortunately, user who added these words speaks Crimean Tatar fluently, but is not in common with spelling rules at all, so I'm now busy with correcting all this. Here you can see full list of articles which are to be corrected. Redirects can be safely deleted. I'll mark all of them with {{delete}} in half an hour or so. At first I rename the group of words, then chek links and iwkis, and than nominate redirects for deletion. Alessandro 19:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Entries with non-standard headers edit


Could you please help me a little bit... One of the users added a plenty of words in the Northern dialect of the Crimean Tatar language. I want to give a correspondence in the standard written Crimean Tatar for each of these words, as I have already done here. But a bot marked the page as an "Entry with non-standard header". So I have a question: how and where should I place literary correspondence for dialectal words? Alessandro 09:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

How about this format? --EncycloPetey 09:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I think what EncycloPetey has done is an excellent route. You must remember that we have a few set standards and, in general, we should not deviate from this. The trick is to find a way to incorporate the information you want to present within these standards, and I think EP has done so nicely. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 09:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Language headers like ==Crimean Tatar (Northern dialect)== is unacceptable? Information about the dialect should be placed within the section, not in header? Alessandro 09:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, dialects are not acceptable within headers, but rather are usually placed either in the inflection line or in a context tag. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 10:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AF tagging level problems edit

Hi! You may have noted entries you've been correcting getting tagged {{rfc-level|Usage notes at L4+ not in L3 POS section (AutoFormat would have corrected level of Declension)}}. You haven't done anything wrong, but the person who created the entries put the Declension header at level 3, instead of level 4. (e.g. 4 ='s: "====Declension===="). You might fix these as you are updating entries? (Existing ones with tags will get fixed sooner or later.) Robert Ullmann 11:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, I'll try to fix this while updating entries. Alessandro 14:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

epsi edit

Is this merely a misspelling (deletable), or another spelling of the same word?—msh210 17:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Never mind: I see someone's deleted it.—msh210 18:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply