Poeticbent
This entry was correctly formatted. You introduced quite a number of formatting and content errors. --EncycloPetey 21:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- No, categories are supposed to be at the end of the language section. If you refuse to learn form your mistakes, you will be blocked. --EncycloPetey 21:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Please explain how your comment of "you weren't even looking at what you're were doing, how disappointing...so congratulations on making it worse" relates to your idea of assuming good faith. --EncycloPetey 21:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- I added a few items there that were valid i.e. krakus, and the English spelling of Krakow which is more popular in English nowadays than Cracow (an article I worked on in en:Wikipedia for months and researched the English usage), but you just blanket reverted me. Please remember I'm here also to help the project and I do expect to communicate with you in talk in case of an error rather than have my edits instantaneously reverted. --Poeticbent 22:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- The entry already had that spelling, and had it formatted in the proper section. You moved the alternative spellings to the definition line (which is wrong), moved the categories to the end of the page (also wrong), eliminated the notice that the accented form was an alternative spelling (also wrong), inserted a section header for "Derivative terms in the Polish language" (also wrong), and added translations of derived terms in a place other than the entry for those terms (also wrong). Whatever you may have done on Wikipedia, you do not know Wiktionary format at all, and have been very rude about it. Introducing format errors and being angry do not help any project. I did communicate with you, but you chose to blank out my comments. --EncycloPetey 22:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- I added a few items there that were valid i.e. krakus, and the English spelling of Krakow which is more popular in English nowadays than Cracow (an article I worked on in en:Wikipedia for months and researched the English usage), but you just blanket reverted me. Please remember I'm here also to help the project and I do expect to communicate with you in talk in case of an error rather than have my edits instantaneously reverted. --Poeticbent 22:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Please explain how your comment of "you weren't even looking at what you're were doing, how disappointing...so congratulations on making it worse" relates to your idea of assuming good faith. --EncycloPetey 21:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wiktionary!
If you have edited Wikipedia, you probably already know some basics, but Wiktionary does have a few conventions of its own. Please take a moment to learn our basics before jumping in.
First, all articles should be in our standard format, even if they are not yet complete. Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with it. You can use one of our pre-defined article templates by typing the name of a non-existent article into the search box and hitting 'Go'. You can link Wikipedia pages, including your user page, using [[w:pagename]], {{pedia}}, or {{wikipedia}}.
Notice that article titles are case-sensitive and are not capitalized unless, like proper nouns, they are ordinarily capitalized (Poland or January). Also, take a moment to familiarize yourself with our criteria for inclusion, since Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia. Don't go looking for a Village pump – we have a Beer parlour. Note that while Wikipedia likes redirects, Wiktionary deletes most redirects (especially spelling variations), in favor of short entries. Please do not copy entries here from Wikipedia if they are in wikipedia:Category:Copy to Wiktionary; they are moved by bot, and will appear presently in the Transwiki: namespace.
A further major caveat is that a "Citation" on Wiktionary is synonymous with a "Quotation", we use these primary sources to construct dictionary definitions from evidence of the word being used. "References" (aka "Citations" on Wikipedia) are used predominantly for verifying Etymologies and usage notes, not the definitions themselves. This is partly to avoid copyright violation, and partly to ensure that we don't fall into the trap of adding "list words", or words that while often defined are never used in practice.
- Note for experienced Wikipedians:
- Wiktionary is run in a very different manner from Wikipedia and you will have a better experience if you do not assume the two are similar in culture. Please remember that despite your experience on Wikipedia, that experience may not always be applicable here. While you do not need to be an expert, or anything close to one, to contribute, please be as respectful of local policies and community practices as you can. Be aware that well-meaning Wikipedians have unfortunately found themselves blocked in the past for perceived disruption due to misunderstandings. To prevent a similar outcome, remember the maxim: be bold, but don't be reckless!
- Having said that, we welcome Wikipedians, who have useful skills and experience to offer. The following are a couple of the most jarring differences between our projects that Wikipedians may want to learn up front, so things go smoothly for everyone. Changing policy pages on Wiktionary is very strongly discouraged. If you think something needs changing, please discuss it at the beer parlour, after which we may formally vote on the issue. You should also note that Wiktionary has very different user-space policies, we are here to build a dictionary and your user-page exists only to facilitate that. In particular we have voted to explicitly ban all userboxes with the exception of
{{Babel}}; please do not create or use them.
We hope you enjoy editing Wiktionary and being a Wiktionarian. Conrad.Irwin 21:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)