Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages

A fourth bullet will be added to WT:CFI#Constructed_languages stating:

"There is consensus that languages whose origin and use are restricted to one or more related literary works and its fans do not merit inclusion as entries or translations in the main namespace. They may merit lexicons in the Appendix namespace. These languages include Quenya, Sindarin, Klingon, and Orcish."

The mentioned languages will be removed from their current section, as well.

Support Dmcdevit 15:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support DAVilla 15:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Ruakh_TALK 16:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support EncycloPetey 17:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Atelaes 17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Robert Ullmann 17:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC) you'll have to modify the second as well, so to continue to make it clear that all 23 constructed languages with iso codes are mentioned in one category or another[reply]
Support Tim w. 18:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Connel MacKenzie 05:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC) In light of recent discourse, I give this option the strongest support imaginable.[reply]
Support Saltmarsh 11:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Widsith 10:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support SemperBlotto 10:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Phat support (but we get to keep Qapla', yes?). bd2412 T 20:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Williamsayers79 21:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Richardb 05:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Even this inclusionist draws the line somewhere.! (I don't think we will ever have any Klingon readers !)[reply]

Oppose H. (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Useless though it may be regarding the vast majority above, I’d like to have any word here. I want to learn Quenya some time, see. H. (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this passes. CFI modified. Dmcdevit·t 02:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]