Talk:行

Also "province"?

Wasn't this character also used in Chinese to mean "province" during the Yuan Dynasty? 204.11.186.190 15:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Dialectal readings and splits

@Justinrleung Hi. This entry, as a very common character, could use topolect readings split by senses as well! TIA --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 10:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Atitarev: I've added some readings. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 07:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2022–November 2023

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

行

Japanese. Rfv-sense: bank. Added and RFV'd here by @Poketalker but not listed. The DJR contains no such sense but jisho has "bank" both as a suffix sense as well as a counter sense for this reading (こう). The counter sense looks attestable from a quick search. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 03:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

RFV failed. Cnilep (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

@User:Cnilep, why did this fail? 行 as kō certainly appears as an element in compounds meaning "bank", as in the term 行員 (kōin, “bank employee(s)”) or as the counter in things like google:"これら三行は". ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 18:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion was open for nearly a year (and the tag was present for several years) with no citations added, so I closed it. I don't know whether 行員 is something like a compound, but I don't claim it is not. That seems like a question that might possibly have a historical answer. I also don't know of any use as a free lexical item with that sense – but again, I don't claim that none exist, just than no one suggested any between 2022-2023. Cnilep (talk) 03:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)