Welcome edit

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! --Vahag (talk) 12:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

կրիկետ edit

«Կրիկետ»-ը հայերեն «ծղրիդ» չի նշանակում։ Անգլերենի հետ եք խառնել։ --Vahag (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ճիշտն ասած ես չեի նկատել որ տակը գրված էր կրիկետը: --Vadgt (talk) 15:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Inserting Armenian into Etymologies edit

I reverted your edits to du and to team because they were obviously wrong. Just sounding like a similar word isn't reason to say that one came from the other, or that they're related in a particular way. They can be inherited from a common ancestor, or borrowed from a common source, or even just happen to similar by coincidence (with the millions of combinations of words possible between two languages, this happens all the time). It takes knowledge of the history of the words in the two languages to tell. If you don't know the difference, you shouldn't be editing etymologies. In some ways, putting bad information in etymologies is a worse kind of vandalism than writing "poop" or blanking pages, because it's not as easy to spot, and it may stay long enough for people to be misinformed.

Also, I would advise putting known Armenian cognates in every etymology. In the case of du, they're no doubt related via common inheritance from Proto-Indo-European, but so are similar terms in literally hundreds of languages. They should be limited to cases where there are historical connections, or where the etymology is showing cognates in multiple branches of the Indo-European languages (not counting English, which is treated differently because this is English Wiktionary).

I'm spending the time to explain this because I've seen too many unnecessary cognates in languages like Kurdish and Albanian littering hundreds of etymologies where they don't belong, and I don't want the same thing to happen with Armenian.

This is nothing against Armenian, which is a remarkable language that's of great value in Indo-European studies. With all the pressure from other languages and everything that's been done to the Armenian people, it's a miracle that it exists at all. You have every reason to be proud of your language- so the last thing you should want is for your language to be viewed as intrusive clutter, like spam. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply