Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Ruakh as a local English Wiktionary Bureaucrat. I'm sure I don't need to explain why he's a good choice, and I do believe that we need another 'crat to keep things moving. As an example, WarrdrBOT did not get the bot flag until around 20 days after the vote passed, and only because the bot was flooding the recent changes, approved but without a flag. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds03:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I co-nominate Ruakh for bureaucrat because more are needed. Of the bureaucrats that we have, only three are active enough to do the job, which for a project this big, is not enough. Therefore, if Ruakh is willing, I think he would be the perfect join for bureaucrat! Thanks, Razorflame06:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SupportNeskaya … gawonisgv? 06:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Definitely, Ruakh is a great choice for this and I'm glad that he's accepted the nomination. I think that having another 'crat around will be a good thing for the wikt. --Neskaya … gawonisgv?06:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Abstain
AbstainLiliana• 17:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC) While we've had a lot of disagreements in the past, I as an involved party don't feel well about voting either way. -- Liliana•17:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]