Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-06/Tohru for deadmin

Tohru for deadmin edit

  • Voting on: Removing Tohru as an admin. No edits since 2012.
  • Vote starts: 00:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Support edit

  1.   Support Special:Log/Tohru suggests Tohru does not need the tools. The next-to-last logged action is from 26 October 2010, which is about 5.5 years ago. The single last logged action is from 2012.

    Furthermore, the magic keyword {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} gives 100 admins, and therefore, there is no risk that removing admin rights creates unhealthy concentration of power. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 08:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support -Xbony2 (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support --Vahag (talk) 08:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support without prejudice to re-establishing the user as an admin if he/she becomes active again. Equinox 08:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support without prejudice per Equinox. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

  1.   Abstain I have no opinion, but I just wanted to point out that I read deadmin as dead-min rather than as de-admin. I found it pretty funny. --WikiTiki89 18:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    This also works well with co- + in-: coin here, coin-mate, coin tense, etc. Equinox 08:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Q: What do they call it when the reindeer cavalry arrives to save the day? A: reinforcements! --Tropylium (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I reread the title of this vote just now and had the same reäction as Wyang. I was curious whether someone had already commented on the matter, and y'all did not disappoint. —JohnC5 15:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @JohnC5: Wyang? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Per utramque cavernam: Who knows? This is the second time I've called WikiTiki by the wrong name recently. I just read too quickly sometimes. —*i̯óh₁nC[5] 00:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decision edit

6-0-1 (100%-0%) Passes. @Stephen G. Brown, SemperBlotto, Chuck Entz --Daniel Carrero (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Chuck Entz (talk) 07:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]