Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂énts
Proto-Indo-EuropeanEdit
EtymologyEdit
ReconstructionEdit
According to Kloekhorst the paradigm can't be properly reconstructed due to ambiguity of the grammatical gender of 𒄩𒀭𒍝 (ḫa-an-za), which could have been either common or neuter. Therefore ἄντα could either reflect *h₂ént-h̥₂ or *h₂ént-m̥.[1]
NounEdit
*h₂énts ?[2]
InflectionEdit
In case it was animate:
Athematic, amphikinetic | |||
---|---|---|---|
singular | |||
nominative | *h₂énts | ||
genitive | *h₂n̥tés | ||
singular | dual | plural | |
nominative | *h₂énts | *h₂énth₁(e) | *h₂éntes |
vocative | *h₂ént | *h₂énth₁(e) | *h₂éntes |
accusative | *h₂éntm̥ | *h₂énth₁(e) | *h₂éntm̥s |
genitive | *h₂n̥tés | *? | *h₂n̥tóHom |
ablative | *h₂n̥tés | *? | *h₂n̥tmós |
dative | *h₂n̥téy | *? | *h₂n̥tmós |
locative | *h₂ént, *h₂énti | *? | *h₂n̥tsú |
instrumental | *h₂n̥téh₁ | *? | *h₂n̥tbʰí |
In case it was inanimate:
Athematic, amphikinetic | |||
---|---|---|---|
singular | |||
nominative | *h₂ént | ||
genitive | *h₂n̥tés | ||
singular | dual | plural | |
nominative | *h₂ént | *h₂éntih₁ | *h₂énth₂ |
vocative | *h₂ént | *h₂éntih₁ | *h₂énth₂ |
accusative | *h₂ént | *h₂éntih₁ | *h₂énth₂ |
genitive | *h₂n̥tés | *? | *h₂n̥tóHom |
ablative | *h₂n̥tés | *? | *h₂n̥tmós |
dative | *h₂n̥téy | *? | *h₂n̥tmós |
locative | *h₂ént, *h₂énti | *? | *h₂n̥tsú |
instrumental | *h₂n̥téh₁ | *? | *h₂n̥tbʰí |
Derived termsEdit
DescendantsEdit
- Anatolian:
- Hittite: 𒄩𒀭𒍝 (ḫa-an-za)
- Hellenic:
ReferencesEdit
- ^ Kloekhorst, Alwin (2008) Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 5), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 289
- ^ Ringe, Donald (2006) From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A Linguistic History of English; 1), Oxford: Oxford University Press, →ISBN