Reconstruction talk:Gothic/π²π°πΉππ°π»π°πΉπΊπ
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Mnemosientje in topic RFD discussion: April 2019
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
No descendants. βRua (mew) 10:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- I see the second RFD-nomination has already been retracted. [...]
- Reconstruction:Gothic/ππ πΉπ½πΈπΉπ»π° - The 'descendants' were listed at usage notes, something you might have fixed yourself instead of going through the effort of RFD-nomming the entry. I have fixed the entry to include a 'descendants' header, so keep.
- Reconstruction:Gothic/π πΏπ»ππΉπ»π° - The 'descendants' were listed at usage notes, something you might have fixed yourself instead of going through the effort of RFD-nomming the entry. I have fixed the entry to include a 'descendants' header, so keep.
- In the case of those last two names the basis for their Gothic reconstruction was blindingly obvious from the entry already, so I am not sure why you nominated them at all (assuming you read the entries). That is, unless you nominated them to make a point about the formatting, in which case there are better ways to go about doing that. β Mnemosientje (t Β· c) 10:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)