Talk:سوادو

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kutchkutch in topic Entry

Entry

edit
@शब्दशोधक Thanks for the ping and creating the entry. The spelling looks fine. However, the Hindi and Urdu words are not tadbhavas. The Hindi and Urdu words would be tatsamas.
Moreover, there is no Hindustani descendant at:
Turner, Ralph Lilley (1969–1985) “svādú”, in A Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages, London: Oxford University Press Kutchkutch (talk) 08:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Kutchkutch: Thanks for responding. What should be added to it then? शब्दशोकः 08:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

New signature, by the way. शब्दशोकः 08:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Adding {{lb|ur|rare}} should work, I think, for a tatsama. शब्दशोकः 08:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@शब्दशोधक The tadbhava vs tatsama issue should be corrected now. Yes, {{lb|ur|rare}} should work. Sanskrit and can become overt ی and و. Writing tatsamas in Urdu script avoids having both Urdu script and Devanagari in the same sentence. Kutchkutch (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Return to "سوادو" page.